Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: This movie is based on historical novel, I want to protect page to prevent incorrect information. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question: We don't preemptively protect pages. Is there disruption now? What type and by what users? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- List of people granted executive clemency by Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FactsheetPete (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this becomes an issue later on please feel free to come back and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and revert-warring Sushidude21! (talk) 08:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. HanTsî (talk) 08:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:07, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Pronoun vandalism and edit warring by illiterate, WP:CIR and probably homophobic IP despite sources. Borgenland (talk) 10:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit waring and unsourced Dubious info being added. Sushidude21! (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 16:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism, POV pushing or misinformed editing. Please restrict to autoconfirmed editors until (say) 3 February (Chinese New Year is on 29 Jan). 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same issue as led to the November 2024 protection, a variety of IPs trying to remove/overwrite sourced content from a particular section. Belbury (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Block evading ip repeatedly restoring poorly sourced promotional content in a BLP duffbeerforme (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 13:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AravPerfectlyEdits 13:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done There's been one edit to create that page and that was by you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent low-level IP vandalism for more than five years. Page has previously been protected. Meticulo (talk) 14:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in two weeks. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not clear what arbitration decision requires ECP-ing this page. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: prevention of edit wars over whether the Euromaidan revolution counts as a coup d'etat Bird244 (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ye olde IPs swarming to an article about a supposed new hiring and adding info without it being formally confirmed anywhere, in violation of WP:SPORTSTRANS. The Kip (contribs) 15:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Bagumba. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Previous one-month protection expired in late December. All edits since then have been vandalism and cleanup. Waste of time. Longer protection seems necessary. Chrisahn (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several unconfirmed users, potentially socks, have repeatedly changed "Gulf of Mexico" to "Gulf of America" without Wikipedia consensus on what should be done about this change. AnotherWeatherEditor (talk) 16:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA sockpuppeting and adding personal phone numbers. Alith Anar 16:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Isla🏳️⚧ 16:16, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Pppery: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: No Protection 2A00:1FA3:50D:CEAD:0:2A:567D:9701 (talk) 09:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Do you have a reason why? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – It would require a very persuasive rationale, given the persistence of the sock master in question. Favonian (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because it is not necsessary to protect it 2403:6200:89A7:1616:F977:ED1F:EB82:4209 (talk) 10:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Do you have a reason why it's not necessary? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 10:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected. The page was necessarily protected due to persistent vandalism. The talk page is not protected and you can suggest improvements to the article there and if there is consensus, make an edit request. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
'Reason: Decrease to Semi-protection: its nothing have to do with consigned enforcement likeably for just oriental dispute in less than 1year gap which is not enough curable for at least WP:GSCASTE sanction, as far as I can tell, the information should be reduced a little because if it becomes too strict or protective, it might stop people from editing articles in the future. The whole idea of making this platform human-driven WP:Independent and encyclopaedic could get lost. I’ve noticed this happening over the past few days, and I feel it’s better to make things a bit simpler so new users can actually understand and contribute properly. 114.79.136.104 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (in discussion: talk page: there was opposition to changing the name of the article (“Gulf of Mexico”) because there are no reliable source currently using “Gulf of America”. The status has changed. The Coast Guard is officially using the new status: “Gulf of America”.) . JaneDoeSelvidge (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.